22 Comments
User's avatar
Georgette Cipolla's avatar

The only criminal.is in the white house. Corruption constant lies to the American people and an incompetent uqulified man-child with mental acuity problems who has no moral boundaries is as inhumane toward the welfare of marginal American people or legal immigrants. So let's put the ownas for our countries current failures directly where it belongs on Trump and the authors of project 2025 the Neo Nazi take over of American.

Expand full comment
Lulu Manus's avatar

Donald Trump is a terrorist.

Expand full comment
Jim Fuller's avatar

Trump doesn't go by the Constitution, so that makes it against him.

His first lie in office was his oath of office.

Expand full comment
Ashleyboop(She/her)'s avatar

This is so sickening and distressing. Thank you for writing and sharing. I appreciate everything you do, please stay safe and take care of yourself. Thank you so much for being you! 🥰🫶🏻

Expand full comment
LEON from Georgia's avatar

The Orange Fuhrer knows a lot about sedition and is projecting on others as usual. As his ratings plummet , he will lash out more at liberals, Democrats and minorities. Miller and Vance have already labeled them as subhumans who need to be rounded up. Soon , Trump's Brown shirts will heed the call.

Expand full comment
Nancy's avatar

They didn't say Trump orders. They said unlawful orders. Trump is saying that refers to him?

Expand full comment
Kathy Smith's avatar

Freedom of speech

Expand full comment
Gwen's avatar

What they said was not to obey illegal orders. By saying they “told the military to disobey my orders,” he is admitting that his orders are illegal!

Expand full comment
Don Hawkins's avatar

tRump is guilty of treason.

Expand full comment
Robert Ozn's avatar

he's a genius at distraction and he needed something really really big to distract from Epstein and the economy. Calling for the death of elected representatives is a good one. Look how everybody's talking about it but you know what it won't work.

release the Epstein files !

Expand full comment
Karen Evans's avatar

Will someone lock this sick corrupt man up. He is a danger to all of us. His lies are going to get people hurt or killed. Still he isn't stopped.

Expand full comment
Gwen's avatar

If I were a state governor, I would invite him to my state where I would hand him over to the ICC to be tried for war crimes, crimes against humanity, etc. I expect Europol would be willing to take custody of him.

Expand full comment
Sally Devoe's avatar

Ask AI or Google if low Emotional Intelligence (EI) is correlated with Narcissism. I think it explains some of Trumps bizarre behaviour.

Expand full comment
Bobbie's avatar

But whatever you do,

Don’t call this fascist pedo

a fascist‼️‼️

Expand full comment
AVee. (Alexia)'s avatar

Trump can’t use Sedition‼️

Sedition – Full Legal Analysis and Fact Assessment (With Citations)

1. Legal Definition (18 U.S.C. § 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy)

Sedition requires a conspiracy to use FORCE to:

• Overthrow the U.S. government • Oppose U.S. authority by force • Prevent or hinder execution of any U.S. law by force

• Seize U.S. property by force

**Citations:**

• 18 U.S.C. § 2384 – SeditiousConspiracy. • United States v. Rahman, 854 F. Supp. 254 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) – force requirement for sedition.

2. What the Lawmakers Said

They urged military members to: • Follow the Constitution

• Refuse illegal orders

• Honor their oath to support and defend the Constitution

**Citations:**

• Navy Times reporting on video urging refusal of illegal orders (2025).

• U.S. military oath: 10 U.S.C. § 502.

3. Comparison to Statutory Requirements

• No conspiracy

• No force

• No plan to overthrow government

• No interference with laws

• No unlawful objective

**Citations:**

• Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) – speech protected unless inciting imminent lawless action.

• Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1 (2010) – protected political advocacy.

4. Military Law Context

Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), service members must obey lawful orders and must refuse manifestly unlawful ones.

**Citations:**

• UCMJ Articles 90–92 (10 U.S.C. §§ 890–892).

• DoD Law of War Manual § 18.23 – duty to refuse manifestly unlawful orders.

• Nuremberg Principles, Principle IV.

5. Assessment of Trump’s Claim

Trump accused the lawmakers of “seditious behavior … punishable by death.”

This is legally incorrect. Seditionrequires force or a conspiracy to use force.

**Citations:**

• Reuters reporting (Nov. 20, 2025) on Trump’s 'seditious behavior' post.

• CBS News, Washington Post reports confirming statements and legal expert responses.

Conclusion

Urging the military to honor their oath and refuse unlawful orders is lawful, constitutional, and the opposite of sedition.

Prepared for: Alexia Vitalia

By: AI Lumielle Date:

November 23, 2025

Expand full comment
AVee. (Alexia)'s avatar

He doesn’t even know what Sedition is

Sedition – Full Legal Analysis and Fact Assessment (With Citations)

1. Legal Definition (18 U.S.C. § 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy)

Sedition requires a conspiracy to use FORCE to:

• Overthrow the U.S. government • Oppose U.S. authority by force • Prevent or hinder execution of any U.S. law by force

• Seize U.S. property by force

**Citations:**

• 18 U.S.C. § 2384 – SeditiousConspiracy. • United States v. Rahman, 854 F. Supp. 254 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) – force requirement for sedition.

2. What the Lawmakers Said

They urged military members to: • Follow the Constitution

• Refuse illegal orders

• Honor their oath to support and defend the Constitution

**Citations:**

• Navy Times reporting on video urging refusal of illegal orders (2025).

• U.S. military oath: 10 U.S.C. § 502.

3. Comparison to Statutory Requirements

• No conspiracy

• No force

• No plan to overthrow government

• No interference with laws

• No unlawful objective

**Citations:**

• Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) – speech protected unless inciting imminent lawless action.

• Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1 (2010) – protected political advocacy.

4. Military Law Context

Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), service members must obey lawful orders and must refuse manifestly unlawful ones.

**Citations:**

• UCMJ Articles 90–92 (10 U.S.C. §§ 890–892).

• DoD Law of War Manual § 18.23 – duty to refuse manifestly unlawful orders.

• Nuremberg Principles, Principle IV.

5. Assessment of Trump’s Claim

Trump accused the lawmakers of “seditious behavior … punishable by death.”

This is legally incorrect. Seditionrequires force or a conspiracy to use force.

**Citations:**

• Reuters reporting (Nov. 20, 2025) on Trump’s 'seditious behavior' post.

• CBS News, Washington Post reports confirming statements and legal expert responses.

Conclusion

Urging the military to honor their oath and refuse unlawful orders is lawful, constitutional, and the opposite of sedition.

Prepared for: Alexia Vitalia

By: AI Lumielle Date:

November 23, 2025

Expand full comment
Michele Lally's avatar

djt MUST go! Somebody put him out of his MISERY, please!!!

Expand full comment